Could this photo be a specimen of the sub-endemic Senecio pygmaeus, or just a small Senecio vulgaris ? Note the leaves which are not deeply lobed; plant about 10cm high,
Thanks
Sub-endemic Senecio pygmaeus
Moderators: AlanOuten, MWP admin, IL-PINE
Sub-endemic Senecio pygmaeus
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Yes, I agree this should be a small Senecio vulgaris specimen.
After reading Weber's flora, I am keeping an eye on Senecio pygmaeus a sort of dwarf version of S. vulgaris but with less lobed leaves. It is of certain important because it is sub-endemic. So when you see a small S.v. plant keep an eye on the leaf details.
Here's the only photo on the net (apart from that in Weber book)
http://www.dipbot.unict.it/fito_new/ter ... maeus.html
After reading Weber's flora, I am keeping an eye on Senecio pygmaeus a sort of dwarf version of S. vulgaris but with less lobed leaves. It is of certain important because it is sub-endemic. So when you see a small S.v. plant keep an eye on the leaf details.
Here's the only photo on the net (apart from that in Weber book)
http://www.dipbot.unict.it/fito_new/ter ... maeus.html